Religion doesn't exempt taxation.

Byline: ON THE JOB By Dan Grinfas For The Register-Guard

Question: I have a Muslim employee who initially refused to complete a W-4 form, claiming that for religious reasons he is exempt from having taxes withheld from his paycheck. I convinced him that by law he had to complete the W-4,

but he is still adamant that we may not withhold taxes. Does he have a valid basis to claim an exemption?

Answer: No. Many employees, invoking the First Amendment to the Constitution, have argued that they should be exempt from the income tax because taxes are used to fund government programs that they oppose for religious reasons.

However, courts have rejected these claims. In a 1982 case, United States vs. Lee, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that the tax system "could not function if denominations were allowed to challenge the tax system because tax payments were spent in a manner that violates their religious belief."

The Form W-4 is also known as the Employee's Withholding Allowance Certificate, and some employees have tried to protest against completing the form by claiming they don't have to "allow" withholdings. But it's not the employee's choice whether to allow withholding.

The Internal Revenue Service says that when an employee refuses to complete a Form W-4, the employer should still take taxes out of the employee's pay.

Employers must ask all employees to submit a signed W-4 form when they start work, and withholding must begin effective in the first pay period. If an employee does not submit a W-4, the employer should withhold as if the employee were single and claiming no allowances.

Some employees refuse to provide a Social Security number on the W-4 form, citing privacy or religious reasons, but they are obligated to do so despite these objections.

In 1999, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals addressed this issue in Sutton vs. Providence St. Joseph Medical Center. Sutton objected to providing his Social Security number to his employer, saying he believed that the number was the "Mark of the Beast" prophesied in the Book of Revelations. The employer withdrew its employment offer, and Sutton sued for religious discrimination. The court upheld the employer's action, finding that the requested accommodation would pose an undue hardship.

Employers who encounter this type of objection can mail the incomplete Form W-4 to the W-4 Coordinator at the IRS service center. The IRS will then send a letter advising the employee that he or she is subject to a $500 penalty for failing to provide a Social Security number.

Question: We have an employee, Bruce, who likes to travel to attend a weeklong, annual religious convention - a retreat where he meets members of other churches. This year, he submitted a vacation request two weeks ahead of the convention, and his supervisor denied the request because of our "first come, first served" vacation policy. Four other employees in the same department already have been approved for time off, and as this is a busy time of year for us, we can't spare anyone else. Is it discriminatory to deny Bruce's request?

Answer: Probably not, because attendance at this event seems to be a matter of personal preference for Bruce and not a tenet of his religion. If Bruce were requesting time off for a religious holiday or for the Sabbath when his religion prohibited him from working, you'd be obligated to make reasonable accommodations for him, provided that his religious belief is sincerely held and that accommodating his request wouldn't pose an undue hardship.

You're not required to make special accommodations based on mere preference. If Bruce claims attendance is required under his religion, you can require documentation from his priest or minister. And if Bruce knew about the "first come, first served" policy, you may be able to show that Bruce's request creates an undue hardship such that you're not obligated to bump another employee.

On The Job is written by Dan Grinfas of the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries. Contact BOLI at (503) 731-4200, or BOLI, 800 N.E. Oregon St. No. 32, Portland, OR 97232.

Related Articles

  • ADA Rule Clarified.
  • Tackling one of the most difficult topics facing employers under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has issued an enforcement guidance to clarify what reasonable accommodation means. The agency reiterates its position that it is ......
  • Disability laws put onus on employer.
  • Byline: ON THE JOB By Dan Grinfas For The Register-Guard Question: We hired a gentleman to work in our Information Technology department. He came to us with impressive credentials, including a bachelor of science degree and experience as a network ......
  • Reason of the Witch.
  • Can witchcraft triumph over a politically connected teachers union? Robert L. Hurt, an accounting professor at California State Polytechnic University, is pitting his Wiccan faith against the California Faculty Association. Hurt doesn't actually belong to the union, but because he ......
  • Employers can verify religious requests.
  • Byline: ON THE JOB by Bureau of Labor and Industries For The Register-Guard Question: Last week, our employee William told his supervisor that he did not want to be off work on Christmas Eve or Christmas Day (both are company ......
  • Be careful with stinky problem.
  • Byline: ON THE JOB by Bureau of Labor and Industries For The Register-Guard Question: We have an employee who has a very bad body odor. And because we are in a small office and we sit in cubicles, this affects ......
  • Employee time management: reducing labor while increasing information.
  • What expense makes up the largest percentage of your budget and requires the most labor? And what expense is the most poorly tracked and allocated, the most highly regulated by outside agencies, and the least automated for day-to-day accounting? There ......
  • To tell or not to tell.
  • To tell or not to tell is a question faced by everyone with MS. The question is really many questions: Whom to tell? When to tell? How to tell? Even where to tell? Do you tell someone you've just' started ......
  • Law allows time off for victims of crime.
  • Byline: ON THE JOB By Dan Grinfas For The Register-Guard Question: We've heard there's a new Oregon law that allows employees to take time off work to attend court hearings. What are the specifics? Answer: You are referring to Senate ......
  • Holiday pay policy needs to be clear.
  • Byline: ON THE JOB By Bureau of Labor & Industries True or false? 1. For certain holidays, employers are required to grant their employees a day off with pay. Answer: False. While many employers give employees paid days off on ......
  • When odors disrupt, employer within rights to act.
  • Byline: On the job by Bureau of Laabor & Industries For The Register-Guard Q: We have a problem with a staff member who comes to work reeking of perfume. Other employees with allergies - and some without - complain to ......
  • Court decisions narrow scope of disability act.
  • Byline: On the Job by Bureau of Labor & Industries For The Register-Guard Q: It seems that every week we get new court decisions about the ADA and what it means for employers. What are the latest developments? A: The ......
  • Deciding on wage after the fact is risky business.
  • Byline: On the Job BY Bureau of Labor & Industries For The Register-Guard Q: I hired an employee three weeks ago to help out at my tax service. I told him I could pay up to $10 an hour, depending ......
  • Disability no help in violent outburst.
  • Byline: ON THE JOB by Dan Grinfas For The Register-Guard Question: We recently terminated an employee for violating our workplace violence policy after he threatened to physically harm a co-worker. The employee has since brought us documentation that he's been ......
  • Alcoholism considered a disability.
  • Byline: ON THE JOB by Bureau of Labor and Industries For The Register-Guard Question: My employee has just told me that she is an alcoholic and needs four weeks off to enter a rehabilitation program. Do I have to give ......
  • New Brunswick and Ontario set to end mandatory retirement.
  • New Brunswick and Ontario are taking steps to end mandatory retirement. They will join other provinces that have banned forced retirement--Manitoba, Quebec, Yukon and a number of countries worldwide, including the USA, Australia and New Zealand. However, the amendments, though ......

Related Topics